[Following the publication of this blog, the restaurant have apologised and retracted their advert. The full text of their response is in the comments below]
A Glasgow restaurant has placed an unusual ad in its window. A Thousand Flowers can reveal that Masala Twist in Glasgow’s West End advertised two kitchen roles for erm, men only. Luckily for “the ladies”, they could apply for 2 of the 4 waiting jobs, with the other 2 being reserved for males. There are very few words for what a total shambles this is, besides being almost definitely illegal. ATF did attempt to contact the restaurant for clarity but got no further than “send us your CV.”
The Equality Act of 2010 prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of gender, with a few exceptions, for reasons like national security, to allow for targeted provision of essential services like Womens’ Shelters, for monks – but not for people punting food for profit, as far as we can ascertain.
Discrimination in employment is hardly a new phenomenon: it’s not just the obscene pay gap between genders, it’s also the assumption – and therefore reality – that so many jobs are and will always be gendered. We assign work a gender, and value the men’s stuff more and the women’s because we value men more than women. It appears Masala Twist are prepared to allow women to be looked at for the delight of their punters, so long as there are an equal number of men to do the “real work” – but they definitely aren’t allowed to do the proper “men’s work” in the kitchen.
There’s a far broader question about how many employers behave like this in practice, even if they aren’t blatant enough to make a sign about it and stick it up in their windows. As someone with a decade plus experience in the catering industry, I know the answer to that. Pretending sexism, ageism, classism, racism, and every kind of conceivable prejudice aren’t a fundamental part of the way employing people works would be lying. It’s part of the mutually self enforcing culture that keeps the people at the bottom at the bottom and it’s most acute in “customer facing roles.” You’re not getting a job “front of house” unless you meet pretty exacting standards of beauty and gender conformity is a pretty big part of that, you’re not even getting a job in a call centre unless you learn to get rid of the bits of your accent you’re not supposed to have.
We hope Masala Twist clarify why exactly women can’t work in their kitchen or what makes them exempt from the laws on gender discrimination – but I’m not likely to be sending my CV or eating there any time soon.
More Glasgow “institutions”:
Glasgow Pub Offers Free Gaffer Tape to “Shut Her Up”, Accuses Critics of a “Witch Hunt”
WEEKLY WANKER #067: SUB CLUB
G1 Group Pay up after Polo Lounge Discrimination
Find us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/AThousandFlowers
Follow us on Twitter @unsavourycabal
We would like to thank thousand flowers for raising the concern for the advert placed by our manager for hiring the staff as a business we value our staff same as our customers and we feel really sorry for hurting the sentiments of all genders as we believe in equality as much as everyone do. After discussing with the restaurant manager who placed the advert his intention was to replace the staff with same gender as the current staff working with us, but unfortunately his wordings was not right which he has understood and he is feeling really bad but we would like to mention one thing as well the advert doesn’t says vacancy for chefs as mentioned by the blogger and we feel some people have been sexist as well when saying women’s place is in the kitchen, we can truly confirm that in our businesses we have mix of females and males working and delivering quality food and service.we value the quality and experience of the work more than the gender of the applicant, we at Masala twist would like to once again like to apologise for hurting the sentiments without having the intention of the same
“……his intention was to replace the staff with same gender as the current staff working with us…” … Such an action would be illegal.